Carbon footprint of food packaging

The study by Stiftung Initiative Mehrweg investigates the carbon footprint of reusable versus disposable packaging in Germany’s food industry. It analyses the environmental impact of different packaging materials, focusing on CO₂ emissions throughout the life cycle, from production to disposal. The research highlights how reusable packaging systems, such as crates and containers, significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to single-use packaging. The study provides data-backed insights into the benefits of reusable packaging for sustainability in supply chains, advocating for broader adoption of these systems.

Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable Plastic Crates

This paper evaluates the environmental impact of reusable plastic crates (RPCs) used in Italy for distributing fruit and vegetables. By conducting a life cycle assessment across 12 impact categories, including energy and water consumption, the study finds that the environmental benefits of RPC increase with their number of uses. It finds that initially, the impact is highest during the manufacturing stage, but with more deliveries, the reconditioning process becomes a significant factor. RPCs need to be used at least three times to outperform single-use crates in terms of environmental impact. The study’s approach can also be applied to other reusable packaging systems across Europe.

When plastic packaging should be preferred: Life cycle analysis of packages for fruit and vegetable distribution in the Spanish peninsular market

This paper evaluates the environmental impact of distributing fruit and vegetables in Spain using reusable plastic crates versus single-use cardboard boxes. The study considers five impact categories, including global warming potential and energy consumption, and provides a detailed methodology to guide future assessments. Results show that reusable plastic crates consistently perform better than cardboard boxes across all impact categories and energy consumption indicators. Even in alternative scenarios, plastic crates are environmentally preferable. The analysis suggests that banning plastic packaging may not always be the best option, as it can be more sustainable in specific applications.

Environmental Impacts of Reusable Transport Items: A Case Study of Pallet Pooling in a Retailer Supply Chain

This paper analyses the logistics and environmental impacts of pallet pooling operations in a network serving a large-scale retailer. Pallets, as reusable transport items (RTIs), require careful management to avoid shortages and reduce the need for new production. The study evaluates various pooling scenarios by combining management strategies with different retailer network configurations. Using software with Geographic Information System (GIS) and routing capabilities, the analysis quantifies the logistical and environmental effects, showing that vehicle distances and pollutant emissions can be reduced by 65% and 60%, respectively. The paper offers insights for optimising pallet management to minimise environmental impacts and improve efficiency.

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of polypropylene and cardboard layer pads for transport

As the leading European provider of polypropylene (PP) layer pads used as divider sheets in the food, beverage, pharma, and cosmetic industries, the Cartonplast Group offers its customers reusable layer pads on a rental basis under strict hygiene standards. In 2014, the company conducted a comparative environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of reusable layer pads made from polypropylene (PP) versus corrugated cardboard (CB). This report discusses the results based on updated data from 2020.

A Comparative Case Study to Establish the Breakeven Point Between Specific Reuse and Single-Use Transport Packaging for Cut Flowers

This LCA report evaluates the environmental impact of Corplex’s reusable plastic flower transport box compared to a single-use carton box, aiming to identify the “breakeven” reuse point where the plastic box’s impact becomes lower. Based on theoretical data, four scenarios were modelled, assessing the effects of transport and tertiary packaging. The results suggest that reuse impact is heavily influenced by system variables, including pool size, replenishment rate, and box losses. The study includes a tool to calculate breakeven points, underscoring the need for optimising these factors for effective environmental benefits.

Reusable plastic crates vs. single-use cardboard boxes – Two packaging systems in competition

The report compares two packaging systems: reusable plastic crates and single-use cardboard boxes. Commissioned by the Stiftung-Initiative-Mehrweg (SIM), it responds to studies by the European Federation of Corrugated Board Manufacturers (FEFCO) that claim corrugated cardboard packaging is superior. The report challenges this view, arguing that high reutilisation rates, which favour reusable systems, are critical for a circular economy. It highlights the environmental benefits of reusable packaging, particularly its role in reducing dependence on imports and promoting technological sovereignty. The report also calls for maintaining the waste hierarchy and using life cycle analyses to justify deviations from it.

Plastic-based reusable systems in the circular economy

This report represents the beginning of a series of analyses and evaluations of plastic-based reusable systems compared to their single-use competitors. Initially, three reusable systems were analysed and shown whether and under which conditions they have an advantage over single-use systems. In the view of the authors, the results already speak in favour of consistently implementing the waste hierarchy and thus the primacy of reusable systems, formulating conditions for deviating from the waste hierarchy and scrutinising existing deviations. A corresponding approach could accelerate the implementation of a circular economy and reduce the environmental impact of packaging.

Bilan environnemental de la bouteille en verre consigné « 75 cl Alsace » commercialisée dans l’Est de la France par comparaison avec une bouteille en verre à usage unique

This document from Brasserie Meteor focuses on their sustainable development strategy, highlighting the brewery’s efforts to reduce its environmental impact while maintaining quality in beer production. It outlines key initiatives the brewery has undertaken, such as reducing water and energy consumption, minimising waste, and using eco-friendly packaging materials. The report also discusses the brewery’s commitment to sourcing ingredients locally, supporting biodiversity, and enhancing social responsibility by fostering a positive work environment and engaging with the local community. Overall, it showcases Brasserie Meteor’s dedication to sustainability through concrete actions that align with environmental, social, and economic objectives.

Reuse and Recycling Systems for Selected Beverage Packaging from a Sustainability Perspective

This study investigates the economic, environmental, and social impacts of implementing a Deposit Return System (DRS) for beverage containers in Spain. The DRS model involves consumers paying a small deposit on beverage containers, which is refunded when the container is returned for recycling. The study assesses how a DRS could reduce littering, increase recycling rates, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. It also examines the potential economic benefits, including job creation and reduced waste management costs for municipalities. Additionally, the study highlights the positive effects on public awareness and engagement with recycling practices. The findings suggest that a well-implemented DRS could significantly contribute to Spain’s circular economy and sustainability goals.

Generic filters
Search in excerpt