Retail

Deroche Consultant (2009)

This document from Brasserie Meteor focuses on their sustainable development strategy, highlighting the brewery’s efforts to reduce its environmental impact while maintaining quality in beer production. It outlines key initiatives the brewery has undertaken, such as reducing water and energy consumption, minimising waste, and using eco-friendly packaging materials. The report also discusses the brewery’s commitment to sourcing ingredients locally, supporting biodiversity, and enhancing social responsibility by fostering a positive work environment and engaging with the local community. Overall, it showcases Brasserie Meteor’s dedication to sustainability through concrete actions that align with environmental, social, and economic objectives.

PwC (2011)

This study investigates the economic, environmental, and social impacts of implementing a Deposit Return System (DRS) for beverage containers in Spain. The DRS model involves consumers paying a small deposit on beverage containers, which is refunded when the container is returned for recycling. The study assesses how a DRS could reduce littering, increase recycling rates, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. It also examines the potential economic benefits, including job creation and reduced waste management costs for municipalities. Additionally, the study highlights the positive effects on public awareness and engagement with recycling practices. The findings suggest that a well-implemented DRS could significantly contribute to Spain’s circular economy and sustainability goals.

Stiftung Initiative Mehrweg (2013)

This study investigates the impact of packaging types (disposable vs. reusable) on the spoilage and damage of fresh fruits and vegetables during transport. It analyses damage rates across two distribution levels, showing significantly lower damage for reusable packaging. Additionally, it evaluates the freshness and bacterial contamination of produce stored in different packaging. The findings indicate that reusable packaging is more effective in reducing product spoilage, packaging damage, and food wastage compared to disposable alternatives. The study also explores the potential effects of temperature and humidity on product freshness.

Nessi et al. (2014)

The paper assesses the environmental benefits of using self-dispensing systems for liquid detergents in Italian retail stores, where consumers refill containers instead of using single-use plastic bottles. A life cycle assessment (LCA) compared these systems to traditional packaging for various detergents, focusing on waste reduction, energy demand, and environmental impacts. Results show that self-dispensing systems can reduce waste by up to 98% and decrease energy use and environmental impacts, with greater benefits seen as containers are reused more frequently.

Pastacchini et al. (2018)

This study aims at improving the environmental sustainability of an existing honey production supply chain, pursuing the Sustainable Supply Chain Management philosophy and the Life Cycle Assessment principles. Focusing the attention on the packaging stage and, in particular, on the most commonly used honey packaging solution, the glass jar, this study assesses the environmental burdens associated with its manufacturing, distribution and final disposal. It models various reuse scenarios involving collaboration between producers and a beekeeping consortium. The study compares these scenarios to the current packaging system in an Italian province, measuring five key environmental factors. Results show that a packaging reuse policy could reduce environmental burdens by 16% to 70%, depending on the reuse rate, over five years.

Ponstein (2019)

The paper assesses greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from wine production in Germany, analysing data from five wineries, one wine cellar, and nine grape producers. The study finds that emissions range from 0.753 to 1.069 kg CO2e per bottle of wine, with the main contributors being bottle weight (31%), electricity usage (18%), and heat (11%). Most emissions occur during the winery phase, primarily due to packaging materials (57%). The paper identifies that reusing glass bottles offers the greatest potential for reducing emissions, surpassing the impact of reducing bottle weight. Combining bottle reuse with renewable energy and bottle weight reduction could cut GHG emissions per bottle by 47%.

Bocken et al. (2022)

The paper investigates reusable packaging business models for fast-moving consumer goods (FMCGs) to address global environmental challenges caused by their disposable nature. It focuses on identifying success factors, drivers, and barriers in a circular business model pursued by a company operating in both in-store and e-commerce contexts. Through interviews and a consumer survey in Berlin, the study highlights five success factors, including partnerships, operations efficiency, and consumer participation. Environmental concerns motivate consumers, while logistics and costs are major barriers. Recommendations for scaling these models are provided based on the findings.

Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (2022)

The fact sheet from IFEU focuses on the environmental benefits of using reusable glass jars for food packaging. It compares the life cycle impacts of reusable glass containers with single-use packaging, particularly in terms of resource consumption, energy use, and carbon emissions. The document highlights that reusable glass jars have a lower environmental impact after several reuse cycles, reducing waste and conserving resources. It advocates for expanding the use of reusable glass containers to minimise environmental harm in the food industry.

UN Environment Programme (2022)

The report analyses the environmental impact of single-use plastic food packaging compared to alternative packaging solutions. The report highlights the widespread use of plastic in supermarkets, noting that plastic dominates all packaging materials, especially in North America. Single-use plastics contribute significantly to plastic pollution, with food packaging playing a major role. The report draws from 33 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies, focusing on three key food categories: refrigerated products, fresh produce, and pantry goods. It identifies four main themes: the relationship between packaging and food waste, the potential of bio-based and biodegradable plastics, the viability of reusable packaging systems, and the limited consideration of plastic litter’s effects on ecosystems and human health. These findings provide recommendations for policymakers to consider alternatives to single-use plastic packaging in supermarkets.

Eunomia (2023)

This study builds upon Eunomia’s previous investigation into materials decarbonisation pathways. Focussing on the four materials with the greatest emissions globally, the study found that each will have great difficulty in reducing GHG emissions in line with a 1.5°C future by 2050, particularly if mass consumption continues and increases. Whilst studying the global material picture provides valuable insights; policymakers may find it more useful to have the same approach applied at the product level. Therefore, this study delves into the Net Zero pathways of aluminium, PET, and glass when utilised in beverage packaging within the EU, evaluating their potential performance within a cumulative GHG emissions budget that aligns with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

Generic filters
Search in excerpt